Napoleon Dynamite (2004): D
Dear Mr. Dynamite (Jon Heder),
As both a critic and a semi-compassionate adult, I’m writing to inform you that director Jared Hess’ movie about you, Napoleon Dynamite, is a work of such crude, cruel nastiness that you should seriously consider filing a lawsuit against the filmmaker. This “comedy,” which tracks your adolescent misadventures in small-town Idaho with your moronic friend Pedro (Efren Ramirez), your inane brother Kip (Aaron Ruell), your narcissistic Uncle Rico (Jon Gries) and your awkward wannabe-girlfriend Deb (Tina Majorino), spends an intolerably long 82 minutes ridiculing – and encouraging the audience to ridicule – you and your stupid, disgusting, socially retarded acquaintances. In other words, it asks us to behave like the obnoxious high school bullies and cheerleaders who torment you. As far as I can tell, Mr. Hess and his co-screenwriter Jerusha Hess believe that the best (or at least easiest) way to elicit laughs is to create repulsive, spastic characters who can’t comprehend their idiocy, and then to humiliate them time and again. To be sure, you do come across as an amusingly incompetent loser, and your Tourette’s-like penchant for blurting out crazy insults and fantasies about mythical creatures is sort of endearingly pathetic, but the film – by condescendingly trotting out bizarre freaks so we can feel superior to them – functions like an excruciating episode of Jerry Springer. As it stands, Napoleon Dynamite is one of the year’s most offensive films, and if I were you, I’d think about taking legal action against the perpetrators of this vicious celluloid slander.
Sincerely,
Nick Schager


I agree it's overrated but damn ... did someone tell you that you need to start being meaner in your reviews? ;)
Far and away the bests parts of N.D. were ways I related it to external things:
* his body language, sans dance moves, bear an uncanny resemblance to my friend/frequent blog commenter O'dell
* Pedro's toupee reminds me of the Jerky Boys skit: "Pico's Mexican Hairpiece"
In any case, we knew much more interesting geeks from college. If they can do Aliens vs. Predator, why not Tran vs. Bress?
Posted by: Joe Grossberg | August 18, 2004 at 12:11 PM
Am I getting meaner? Maybe it's the fact that I've been sick for weeks, though I really think it's just that a bunch of recent movies (Napoleon Dynamite, Little Black Book, The Brown Bunny, The Village) have not only disappointed me, but made me a little angry. But hey, I really liked The Manchurian Candidate! That's gotta count for something! And I'm looking forward to the sure-to-be-fun-in-a-stupid-way AVP.
As for Napoleon Dynamite, I think the movie is ONLY about making fun of kids that are awkward, weird, or just different. While I won't deny that Napoleon himself is so bizarre that he's sometimes amusing, but the filmmakers just wanted to, as my middle school health teacher once put it, "blow out his candle just to make theirs burn more brightly." The whole thing felt really mean-spirited.
Still, I agree that a Tran vs. Bress film would be the ultimate cinematic experience. I'd pony up a half million to help get that baby funded.
Posted by: Nick | August 18, 2004 at 12:29 PM
What the fuck was that? napoleon was possibly the best movie of all time.
I did not find one moment of it that was boring, bad, or unamusing
As for the comment that it is just making fun of the nerds in highschool, I disagree with that.
I no many nerds who were definitly not offended, and I think that if you, as a nerd, were, you should get your head out of your ass, take a look at the real world,and recognize this movie for the amazing satire that it was.
Posted by: Taylor | October 30, 2004 at 01:52 PM
Unfortunately, I'm not a nerd - I've asked a few people, and they confirmed it - nor is my head inside my ass. I'm not really sure how that last thing would even be possible.
Nonetheless, I appreciate the levelheaded critique of my review. Especially considering that, as someone who can't spell "high school" correctly, you are clearly not one of the nerds I supposedly offended.
Posted by: Nick | October 31, 2004 at 06:07 PM
Hey this movie clearly isn't about making fun of the nerds or socially unaccepted people out there....it's just clearly showing how this "nerd" deals with his reality of being a nerd by not even noticing it. It's about he goes through his life with the cards hes dealt and just enjoying it his way. its not meant to show people to make fun of nerds at all. in fact, i see people quoting Dynamite all the time with "Gosh!" and "Idiot!" "sweet!" people love Dynamite, everyone at school talks about it.
Posted by: Clint | February 17, 2005 at 06:46 PM
I just wanted to thank you for this review. I came across your site merely by chance. So far, you are the only critic I have read who has been spot on about this movie. I watched this with a group of friends (who have been out of high school for several years now) and much to my suprise, they laughed the hardest at scenes such as the one where Napoleon is slammed against a locker, or when he is humiliated in front of large groups of people. The popularity of this movie just goes to show that in these post-Columbine days we have learned nothing. It's a sad movie, really. In the real world, Napoleon would be a severely depressed individual plotting his revenge against his classmates.
Posted by: brian | June 07, 2005 at 08:36 PM
So, if I understand correctly, you're big gripe about Napoleon Dynamite "is ONLY about making fun of kids that are awkward, weird, or just different"...But as you stated so eloquently, they're really a bunch of "stupid, disgusting, socially retarded, repulsive, spastic" and uh, oh yes, "endearingly pathetic"
...they deserve the ridicule. Its the American Way! *s*
Posted by: Six | July 07, 2005 at 07:38 AM
Six -
My point is that making a film about disgusting, retarded, stupid, spastic characters just so you can make fun of them isn't something that should be celebrated. I can recognize Napoleon and company's repugnance without agreeing with the film's mocking tone (or its creation of such misfits just for bullying sport)...
Posted by: Nick | July 07, 2005 at 07:49 AM
Shocking as it may seem, N.D. and company are probably suffering from Asperger's Syndrome (autism to the layman), which essentially places them in the same category as say, a 99-year-old with Alztheimers...But, in this great nation of ours, that's mere psycho-babble...You know, that gives me an idea. A lampoon of socially-challenged elderly adults with senile dementia. Tagline: JUST PRAY YOU DIE YOUNG! *s*
Posted by: Six | July 07, 2005 at 03:20 PM
You might want to fix your server *s*
Posted by: Six | July 07, 2005 at 03:27 PM
Paul Celentano...incredible reference.
The ultimate candle blower.
Posted by: Eric | February 14, 2006 at 03:42 PM
I'm sorry about joining the thread 2 years late, but I only just watched the movie. Having a son with Asperger Syndrome, I have a slightly different perspective. The character of ND, was not, I believe created as repugnant character to be made fun of in the movie. He was portrayed quite accurately, even down to some of the mannerisms, facial expression, hair - I saw my own son over and over. That some find a person/character such as ND repugnant says something about the viewer, not the creator of the character. My response to the movie was not anger that laughs where created at ND's expense - I didn't laugh, but pride that ND and my son keep going back for more. While my son has not been subjected to the locker slams, he has been faced with physical threats yet went back to school the next day with his usual good attitude.
If one views the locker slams as sick jokes, I suspect it is because we thought they were funny back then and think that we have or should have grown up by now and therefor self-righteously point out the error of the movie's ways. These people, both the bullies and the ND's are still out there for real. Portraying their trials and this small yet huge triumph was to me not cruel, but quite kind. The nerds just want to live their dreams as well.
Posted by: KevinLF | August 19, 2007 at 10:38 PM
KevinLF, you're right. This film continues to succeed, even three or four years later, precisely because it portrays with such startling accuracy a set of 10-20 character quirks that we have all seen -- but rarely all together in the same person -- in certain friends, acquaintances, and even, some of us, in our children... in people often labeled as "geeks." Napoleon Dynamite has something much more serious going on than mere geekdom, however, as you Kevin, pointed out, but the filmmakers NEVER intended anything but sympathy for him, and this is exactly what they achieved (witness, the ND paraphernalia that was so popular for so long). Those who laugh loudest when ND is slammed into lockers will certainly never see any value in this movie, because for them, there won't be any. They just don't "get" this movie. They might as well go drink beer till they puke with Summer's boyfriend... and look at each other stupidly, wondering how she lost the election to Pedro...
Posted by: TomC | December 26, 2007 at 07:43 PM