The Bourne Ultimatum recalls The Manchurian Candidate, though it’s the nation’s critics who seem to have been brainwashed into almost unanimously praising this efficient and occasionally exciting, yet too often banal and chilly, threequel. Following up last year’s United 93, director Paul Greengrass (who also directed 2004’s slightly superior The Bourne Supremacy) once again goes for thrills with a political bent, here employing Abu Ghraib-style imagery and pervasive intelligence agency surveillance footage in an attempt to cast amnesiac spy Jason Bourne’s (Matt Damon) revenge mission against the government agency that turned him into a ruthless killer as the return of America’s repressed past crimes. What it peddles is ‘70s-era paranoia and cynicism outfitted with modern trappings. But The Bourne Ultimatum (what’s the ultimatum, exactly?) barely breaks a sweat concocting its formulaic narrative, so busy is it crafting a trio of visually muddled cat-and-mouse sequences (shot with Greengrass’ typically jittery handheld camera) that nonetheless more effectively pinpoint Bourne’s psychological anxiety and confusion than Damon’s robotic, one-note performance. All blue-gray grimness, the film wants to be a serious, no-frills alternative to Hollywood’s loud, splashy superhero spectacles. Yet the seriousness it peddles is merely a counterfeit pose aimed at masking a mechanical story that – epitomized by revelations about its protagonist’s origins that fail to surprise or make any emotional impression – is largely devoid of actual drama.
Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
After United 93 and his two Jason Bourne films, I can safely say that Paul Greengrass is one of the phoniest stylists in the biz. Watching Bourne Ultimatum, which I think is lousy, I was struck by how easily you could predict when the camera was going to make some overly-calculated jump. I picture Greengrass behind the camera smacking his cinematographer upside the head with a stick. I can't believe how easily people confuse his artistic laziness for a legitimate sense of urgency.
Posted by: Ed Gonzalez | December 20, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Ha! Agreed. I think there's some (minor) relationship between the aesthetic he employs in the Bourne films and the stories' themes. Mostly, though, the whole grim-gritty atmosphere is just as shallow and artificial as are the superheroic shenanigans of a Spider-Man 3.
Even Cathy, a fan of the first two films, found this one so dull that she chose to go to sleep on the couch rather than put up with the second hour.
Posted by: Nick | December 20, 2007 at 09:49 PM
Do you still think highly of The Bourne Supremacy, Nick? I really dug the hell out of that movie, so I was flabbergasted at how disappointing this was, especially after the absurd overpraise by most of the (un)critical establishment.
Posted by: Dennis | January 23, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Dennis: To be honest, I'm not sure. I haven't seen Supremacy since it came out, but I suspect that my dislike for Ultimatum has soured me on the entire franchise...
Posted by: Nick | January 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I totally agree, this was a huge let down. There was that giant time warp thing going on that was confusing to me. I mean at the end of the Supremacy he calls Pam, and then you see him disappear, supposedly, in the streets of New York. Why did they try to tie that into this one? It became very convoluted at that point, esp because they re-shot that scene to incorporate it. Matt Damon, I thought, really phoned in his performance. He did a great job in the first two, but in this one it seemed like he was doing this movie under protest. Alot of forced emotion, coupled with almost completely monotone dialogue. Total let down for me. At least we still have Bond.
Posted by: Mike | January 27, 2008 at 07:08 PM
Which movie am I describing?
Jason Bourne is the victim of a "Wanted Dead or Alive" campaign run by a super secret CIA operation.
While escaping from his pursuers, he meets a pretty girl who helps him with his miraculous escapes.
He leads European police on a wild chase down narrow streets.
Another killer for hire is sent to kill him. He is dispatched by Bourne after an incredible fight that would land any normal human into the ICU.
Bourne spies out the headquarters of the unit sent to kill him and calls them on the phone.
He breaks into their headquarters to find information about himself and his pursuers.
All this leads to a thrilling climax where Bourne eliminates his arch enemy and manages to escape.
Which movie? Any Bourne movie you like. They are all the same. Why so many five star ratings?
Posted by: Jim | December 24, 2010 at 12:52 AM