Dialed up to 11 for nearly all of its bloated 138-minute
runtime, Shutter Island adapts Dennis
Lehane’s novel with a baroque extravagance that can’t compensate for lousy
pop-lit source material and a script (by Laeta Kalogridis) that both fails to
elicit engagement with its characters and invest its puzzle-box story with
meta-cinema weight. In 1954, federal marshal Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio)
travels with new partner Chuck (Mark Ruffalo) to New England’s maximum security
mental hospital Shutter Island to investigate the disappearance of a patient
named Rachel Solando. Once there, however, it turns out that nothing is what it
seems, both with regards to the clinical work being spearheaded by Dr. Cawley
(Ben Kingsley) and Teddy’s true motivations for visiting the remote facility.
Except that it doesn’t even take that long for Scorsese to intimate that
strange things are afoot, as an opening tracking shot through a ship mess hall
to a sweaty Teddy puking his brains out, immediately preceded by the Taxi Driver-ish sight of Teddy’s boat emerging
from ghostly mist, makes plain the unreliability of this presented fiction. And
things become even hazier once Teddy and Chuck hear the amazing particulars of
Rachel’s escape, which would have had to involve miracle upon miracle.
Scorsese establishes his set-up with a beautiful array of tense
widescreen compositions, luxurious tracking shots, and (with aid from longtime
collaborator Thelma Schoonmaker) a series of jarring cuts that heighten the
overall impression of reality tearing at the seams. Soon after his
investigation begins, Teddy begins seeing his dead wife (Michelle Williams) in fiery
hallucinations overflowing with grand gestures – CG effects, rear-projection,
fast-forward and rewind (dig that cigarette smoke reentering the filter) – and set
to an array of haunting classical-composer cuts assembled by Robbie Robertson. Whereas
these technically dexterous sequences are rousing in the moment, they overstay
their welcome in nearly all cases, a situation that soon extends to Shutter Island as a whole as it barrels
toward a conclusion that any genre-schooled viewer will see coming from the
opening frames. That journey is an intermittently thrilling one populated by a
peerless cast which also includes Max von Sydow, Emily Mortimer, Jackie Early
Haley and Patricia Clarkson. Yet their performances, like DiCaprio’s central
one, become infected by the same overcooked out-thereness that plagues
Scorsese’s direction, which turns every other storm-cloudy shot (weather = psychology
here) and line of dialogue into a dum-dum-DUM moment. The proceedings quickly
feel fatigued, as if run aground by ominous-itis.
Cinephile that Scorsese is, Shutter Island melds film noir, Holocaust drama, horror scareshow
and Agatha Christie mystery, all while pivoting around an M. Night Shyamalan conceit
noticeable so early on that it drains most of the story’s juice. Scorsese in
fact telegraphs this denouement with such clunkiness that it almost seems as if
he’s determined to expose his pulp material’s true nature so he can then get on
with casting the film – which fundamentally revolves around notions of heroic
fantasy projections and delusions being used as tools of denial from traumatic
realities – as a metaphor for the act of cinemagoing. Unfortunately, the prolonged
nature of a misdirection-laden second act and a climax that doesn’t end until
every last question has been explicitly answered suggests, ultimately, that the
film’s obviousness is less a clever ploy than merely a symptom of the director’s
heavy hand. Which isn’t to say that, scene to scene, Shutter Island’s overwrought style can’t be entrancing – few
directors can generate such menace and terror from a single silky pan or
jarring edit. But beholden to plot above all else, the film’s audio-video
barrage ultimately just puffs up corny B-movie material to the point of distension.
Thanks for this review. I'm glad I didn't waste money at the theater on it, but sounds like a lazy weekday renter to at least admire the Scorsese shots. Wondering if you've seen Moon? I rented it a few weeks ago and thoroughly enjoyed it. For some time you don't know if he's going mad or on the brink of enlightenment. It's also been some time since a movie made me feel for a ""robot"". The part when he calls ""home"" and hears his own voice in the background is just heartbreaking.
OK, back to why I'm trying to get a hold of you: I'd like you're e-mail address for a private message. You can check out my Web site, and if it sounds interesting, I'd love to talk more about it with you. I think you'd be perfect for it. Hope to hear from you soon. Cheers!
Posted by: Meaghan Thomas | March 08, 2010 at 02:57 PM
I completely agree with you. The beginning sequences had the most over-the-top dramatic music that I knew I was wasting my time. Leonardo's character is revealed as pointless and useless in the first 5 minutes. I had no sympathy for him or desire to go through the 2 hour journey with him. But I stayed out of respect for Scorsese.
Posted by: christina | March 13, 2010 at 05:09 PM
Thanks for the review. My young actor friend loved SHUTTER ISLAND so much that he went back to see it a second time the next day! I'll go to see it for the entire experience, good or bad, free on my SAG card!
Thanks again,
Peter
Posted by: peter solari | March 14, 2010 at 02:54 PM